Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
hfm (Healthcare Financial Management) ; 76(2):8-9, 2022.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1762015
2.
Neurology Today ; 22(3):20-20, 2022.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1708285
3.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(2): 424-429, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1175522

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has added further urgency to the need for primary care payment reform. Fee-for-service payments limit the flexibility of practices to respond to crises and leave practices without sufficient revenues when visit volumes decrease. Historic fee-for-service payments have been inadequate, and prior implementations of prospective payments have encountered challenges; there is a need to bring forward the best available evidence on how to design prospective payments for payers and policymakers. Evidence suggests setting primary care investment at 10% to 12% of the total cost of care, approximately translating to an average $85 per member per month, with significant variation based on age and adjustment for medical and social measures of risk. Enhanced investment in primary care should be aligned across payers and support practice transformation to advanced models of care.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Prospective Payment System , COVID-19 , Fee-for-Service Plans , Humans
4.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(Suppl): S170-S178, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099982

ABSTRACT

To respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and recover from its aftermath, primary care teams will face waves of overwhelming demand for information and the need to significantly transform care delivery. INNOVATION: Oregon Health & Science University's primary care team envisioned and implemented the COVID-19 Connected Care Center, a statewide telephone "hotline" service. RESULTS: The hotline has taken more than 5825 calls from patients in 33 of Oregon's 36 counties in less than 3 months. In preliminary survey data, 86% of patients said their questions were answered during the call, 90% would recommend this service, and 70% reported a reduction in stress levels about coronavirus. In qualitative interviews, patients reported their questions answered, short wait times, nurses spent time as needed, and appropriate follow-up was arranged. CONCLUSION: Academic health centers may have the capacity to leverage their extensive resources to rapidly launch a multiphased pandemic response that meets peoples' need for information and access to primary care, while minimizing risk of infection and emergency department use and rapidly supporting primary care teams to make the necessary operational changes to do the same in their communities. Such efforts require external funding in a fee-for-service payment model.


Subject(s)
Hotlines/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Fee-for-Service Plans , Hotlines/organization & administration , Humans , Oregon/epidemiology , Pandemics , Primary Health Care/economics , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/economics , Triage/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL